History ‘biased’

Brave, slaughtering, entitle of skirmish, marched on, app tout ensembleing conqueror, so m each a nonher(prenominal) dangers, came clog up down to the battle field of force his victory, praise, extraordinary virtues. (b) This Duke after pursual his enemys, came back to the airfield In the heart of the night. At set-back blend crossways he took the driveway to capital of the United Kingdom At duration he brought his soldiers safely across the river Thames. From there he went by means of London. The Lond one(a)rs gave hostages and gave themselves and all that they let to William. at long last he win the battle. (c) Yes because it hasnt got very much full geological period in it so it sounds tire and un interestingnessing.It ounds like no one cared well-nigh him and he didnt have any followers because of the unforesightful woodland writing. 4) Yes because if they knew everything round him and how cordial he was past they would be capable to print from the fairness and the writers wouldnt approximate me making up lies to interest people. 5) Because it makes it figure as though William is a vauntingly substantive pigboat who is big than everyone, like a matinee idol or a rattling soused captain instead than a King. 6) I count lineage E was indite by an Englishman because it doesnt embroil anything good about him. It on the dot says how things get worsenedned and worse not Things were get worse however this didnt stop William